Created  Nov. 11, 2010                Updated Oct. 22, 2011

The Last Days Part 10:
(The Sons of Darkness vs. the Sons of Light concerning)
Knowledge & Secrecy

Perhaps to add to this is a very sophisticated study of psychology, not just of the individual, but of groups and masses of people, called sociology. Governments and big business understand us as a massive groups and as individuals and not only can they predict how we will react, but how they can further manipulate us. They know more about us and our tendencies, than even we are aware of. This gives those in power a huge advantage over us. We have little we know of government and big business. So the knowledge flows only one way, from us to them.

That being said, if we were to apply ourselves, there is much that is revealed about those at the top by their own published materials and what the various media present, if we can look beyond the surface and read between the lines, so to speak. But we would have to give it some effort ponder often about what is going on or at the very least, listen to someone who has done much of this themselves and give thought to what they propose.

But know this! Whatever those in power know or do, they want to keep it secret from us and are not about to admit anything bad on their part. So you can be assured that whatever you hear that is negative about those in power, it will be denied, and you will not have much in definitive proof beyond the shadow of all doubt. But you will have enough to make a sound decision if you have courage and continually use your brain. The evidence is there. You will have to look beyond the obvious and draw conclusions from various facts.

An example might be a comparison with kids. Kids will use any stupid excuse to get out of blame or punishment, even if the excuse is very weak or poor; that is to say, inexcusable or not worthy of accepting as a legitimate excuse. As well, authorities also give excuses that are not reasonable or acceptable. They know far too much and if they say they did not know about a certain problem that is well publicized, then this should not be accepted as a believable and reasonable excuse. As elected officials, it is their job to know or find out and if they have not done so, they have not done their job.  They should be fired as any of us would be for not doing our job.

So if you pay careful attention to excuses and explanations and examine them to see if they are reasonable or not, in view of what else is known; and if you search for contradictions, to see if any exist, then you can determine the validity of an excuse. If there are contradictions, then the excuse is unacceptable and you make your decisions from there.

The world today demands that in a court of justice, you must prove beyond a shadow of a doubt, reasonable doubt, or they often twist it to say any doubt at all. But there is a big difference between any doubt and reasonable doubt. Some doubts are just absurd excuses that should never even be allowed or considered, such as someone arguing the ridiculous. Courts like to make it very hard to prove anything so that it is easier to commit crimes and get away with crime, because no one commits more crime and violates more law than the wealthy and powerful.

But reasonable amounts of evidence should be enough to convict in most trials. But courts often refuse to convict on reasonable evidence. They call it "circumstantial" evidence and belittle and deride such evidence. But "circumstantial" is not good or bad. It varies. How much circumstance is there that suggests or denies guilt. In many cases, the circumstances that can be demonstrated are solid evidence for a conviction. If there are enough circumstances showing involvement, connection, motivation, explanation, timing, co-incidence, and other such relations, then you have a solid case. By courts requiring definitive proof, they place most solid convictions out of the reach.

They try to convince you outside the realm of courts, that this should be the standard by which you also judge or measure conspiracy theories and other such related things. They do this because they know they have covered their tracks fairly well and have not left you much in documented irrefutable proof. You will have to depend on associations and related events and such other associations, which are all reasonable justifiable evidence, which if it forms a complete and consistent picture, should resolve any reasonable doubts.

As well, Academia and Education also use the same harsh standard for evidence so that little can be advanced in knowledge and progress of knowledge, discovery, and advancement of technology. They do not want knowledge to advance or grow. They want to slow it down and hinder it as much as possible. And they frequently attack and slander much meaningful research and ideas. Many archaeological artifacts found or excavated are immediately called fraud without any reason. This again hinders any progress, which is their goal at all times.

The goal always is to keep you in darkness while they bask secretly in their "light" of knowledge, which they keep to themselves. This is how the liars keep you in the dark. You need to reconsider the evidence requirements in light of reasonableness and fairness so that the truth can become more easily attainable.

An example I can offer is that of the Mob or organized crime. If a family or syndicate was attacked or one of their boys hit (killed), then they would consider that a serious threat that could not be ignored. They must establish a source of the attack and guilt and retaliate swiftly. They know, better than anyone, that an attack can not be ignored. They believe in the principles of Swiftness, Certainty, and Severity. Write those down, carve them in stone, and never forget them. These are vital to power.

The syndicate attacked, if they can not find any evidence, will then determine who most likely could have launched such an attack, for often, there are only 1 or 2 possible suspects to begin with. So they might even confront the 2 and ask for a good explanation as to why they should not be considered as the guilty parties. If one or both of them can not give good explanations, then they might be deemed guilty "without trial." Retaliation will follow. That is not to say there was no trial but that it was not a formal legal trail but it could well be a careful inquiry that will yield results that are just as reliable as a trial, if not more so. And it will usually be quick and speedy, which modern trials are not, though mandated by the Constitution to be so.

Perhaps one of the suspect parties might not want a war and will be glad to cooperate and give any info they can to exonerate themselves from retaliation. They might even be able to show good evidence that it was the other suspect party who was guilty. After careful searching on the street and collecting circulating rumors, they will make a researched informed decision and take action where it is decided it is needed. They do not want to target an innocent enemy and cause a bloody war for both.

I might point out that in times of war, less evidence is required. In fact, in battle situations, trials are often impractical, if not impossible, so that martial law prevails and men duly appointed by rank are authorized to act to the best of their ability and make judgment and execution, if necessary. Times of war crisis do not allow the same careful attention to justice that are normally afforded when control is secured as it is in normal day to day life.

Now while our own searches can not be as rash as wartime can be, at the same time, we are under attack and at war, psychologically speaking, and in a battle for knowledge and understanding. We can not possibly hope or wait for absolute definitive proof to figure out where the attacks are coming from and who is behind them and what they are. The wicked, the liars, the deceitful, the wealthy, and the powerful, are in control and power. So we need to ask serious tough questions and have to courage to accept where the evidence leads to, and take cover from there.

In the Modern Age
Back to Top

Those at the top are clever enough to carefully limit how many people they have that can do sophisticated engineering and technological development or even repair of such things. If many could do it, then there would be too many competitors who might compete and outbid each other or go to someone willing to pay for their services and allow technology to spread to people and places that those in power do not want others to get, those that threaten power and compete with it.

So power limits how many are taught such valuable skills. They keep careful track and accounting of who can do what, and how much they need now and in the future as well, forecasting needs, so that they can keep those who can do such things to a limited number. That is, advanced engineers and designers are a commodity like grain, oil, steel or any other commodity. And as well, teaching and learning are also commodities that they keep careful track of, not giving or teaching too much, or too little, should they have a great need in some field.

And this is what makes our day and age so treacherous and deceptive. We do not know that knowledge is held back and that we are kept from knowing or doing or being able to do too much. We think we are getting educated but we are not educated anywhere near enough in how our system works.

But it gets worse. To keep us confused and throw us off the trail, should we get some information that might be incriminating to the elite or enlighten us about them and their activities, they put forth and promote different stories, with some truth and some lies. This keeps us guessing what is truth and what are lies. Muddy up the waters and people will have a hard time "seeing." Confusion and distraction are wonderful tools of deception.

It was in the mid 1800s when the elite thought up a new idea to put into action. In the USA, people had always taught their own kids and did a good job, too good from the standpoint of the elite. So the elite said, why don’t we teach the kids instead of the parents doing it. This way we can teach them as little or as much and we want and we want less teaching. And like Pavlov’s dogs, we can condition the kids to behave like docile scared mice who dare not question anything or think for themselves. We can condition and program obedience and maybe even trust. We can present our teachers as authorities to be obeyed at all times and teach kids to believe what ever they are told and believe that they can not learn without teachers and authority.

In fact, we will not hire anyone who does not accept our rules of education and obedience. We will give degrees to those who pass and let them work. The rest we will stick with meaningless low paying jobs that are hated. Anyone not playing by our rules will go nowhere.

So they did this, even publishing it in journals they thought no one would bother to read, except their own elite hired hands. They made all kids go to government schools and made sure they got very little knowledge. A small few would be allowed to progress to far greater knowledge, who passed their tests and came from the right families, who were also among the elite and chosen.

Through mass government education, they shaped and molded the views of the kids and changed them. They kept the kids from their parents. They made prices go up so that both parents would have to work and let others care for their kids. Soon, almost all care and instruction came from anyone but the parents. And kids were kept from thinking, from questioning, from critical analytical skills that that might help them to see through the powerful elites.

And the elite made our lives very difficult and complicated with advanced technology so that we could no longer fix our own cars, do our own electrical writing or repair to appliances or computers and software. Nor do we have the many tools needed to do various repairs or building. In fact, even laws were passed to keep us form doing anything for ourselves. Many places forbid people to work in their cars in their own drive ways. In fact, it is nearly impossible now to grow our own food, legally, in our own yards.

As well, they got rid of all our local farms so that we don’t even have a local farmer who allows us to be regionally independent. We now have to depend on food shipped form overseas so they can control prices and starve us out any time they want. And someday not far away, they will want to starve us out and will.

So now we are completely dependant upon experts and those in power to do everything for us. We have not the time, tools, or knowledge or even legal rights to do most things now. If we are sick or injured, we need to pay a doctor outrageously high amounts for even simple fixes of our health. We have no recourse to justice and law unless we pay someone outrageous sums of money in order to get justice.

But what is worse, is that even after we have paid a lawyer great money, it does not mean he will serve us honestly and he might sell us down the drain. So basically, we do not have justice because we are not of the power elite. We are at the complete mercy of the system and whatever price they want to charge, we will have to pay it for we have no other option or choice and we have no guarantees we will get anything for our money. Justice is totally extinct and been that way for some time.

Whose in Charge You Ask?

Well, let me tell you about that. I mentioned how they track and account for resources like grain and other food supplies. They calculate how much in resources like metal ores, refined metals, oil, coal, electrical dams and all other sorts of resources that are used, not only for industry and production, but also by the military, since the military also depends upon industrial production for their weapons, energy, and food. The Computer Industry is an arm of the military and the government because they rely on computers and so must control the computer industry. The airline industry which moves most soldiers around the world now, and is an arm of the military. The military has the option to take it over in an emergency. Weapons Defense industries are a branch of the military. Any industry which serves the government or the military, directly or indirectly, is an arm of those.

They all work together. Big Business supports, indirectly, all the candidates they approve of, to get them elected. The Political Actions Committees and Non-Profit Foundations direct politicians and instruct them. Together, big business, governments, militaries, tax-exempt "non-profit" foundations, secret societies, and other such networks all link together to form one big united power. Who holds the reigns of this "beast?" That would be interesting to know.

But what I want you to understand is that jobs and especially high paying jobs, are all tracked and kept accounted of, as to how much they pay, how many jobs there are, and who is allowed to have the high paying jobs.  I propose that all high paying jobs are only given to those who belong to this invisible secret networked monolithic power that controls all the kingdoms of the earth, even as the Bible in Revelation says. They reward their members with the best jobs and positions society has to offer. Not just anyone is allowed to have them. Many are trained to handle these jobs, knowing that they also serve a higher purpose in leadership positions in this invisible rule of all the nations and kingdoms.

So those Vice Presidents (VPs) at your local power company? That might just be their "front." They don't likely do much as VPs. They do serve as watchmen and guard dogs over business and as representatives of this secret government that is kept from us. Elected Politicians are the pretend government, supposedly serving us but they serve the secret government instead. They take their orders from members of the secret government and its many arms, all of which are intimately connected with each other. Many of those in big positions often belong to a number of groups and organizations. They may be "consultants" for some parties or groups. They may belong to a "charity," civic cause, or fraternal order or secret society or several. They may serve as volunteers for certain groups or activities. Many jobs in government are well paying and are given to select approved people in the "network."

Again, their ultimate loyalty to a secret higher cause is not known to us. It is kept hidden from us. Hidden knowledge. What they appear to be is not really who they are. It is a disguise to hide and cover their true mission in business, politics, and life. And much of organized crime is also very cooperative with government and law enforcement. Organized crime is often an arm of secret spy agencies of the government. Everything that runs by power and abuse is networked together in one big happy family.

What "proof" do I offer? Not a shred. It is what I have concluded from my own research but you will need to search out on your own. If I tell you directly, I get banned or killed. If I offer no proof, then they can just laugh at me and say I am crazy. But if your looking for answers and where to search, you might consider what I have suggested as a place to start looking.

But consider this! The Bible makes it perfectly clear that there is a secret kingdom over all the kings of the earth. You can believe your literal eyes, which are being lied to, or you can believe God and the Bible and search for that secret government, if you do not believe it exists. But if you do not bother, or wait too long, then you will miss it. It will come unexpectedly by surprise and catch you asleep and unprepared as a thief in the night would do as you sleep. Be Awake and on the Watch!

You need the knowledge and the power and enlightenment it brings. You can not afford to remain in darkness if you are to be a child of light and reap the rewards of a child of light, belonging to God.

Disguises and Shame
Back to Top

I find it interesting how the rich and elite have conducted themselves over the centuries. Most notable are the middle ages AD onward. What follows next is a good example.

http://news.discovery.com/history/venice-masks-18-century-norm-041028.html
Disguise the Norm in 18th-Century Venice
            Visual deception through masks, clothing, shoes, hair coloring and makeup was common for the era.
By Jennifer Viegas
Thu Oct 28, 2004 03:46 PM ET

THE GIST
* Masks and cloaks allowed Venetians to move about the city anonymously.
* Courtesans were especially renowned for their extreme attire.
* The findings highlight problems relating to class structure and the roles that women held in society.

Masks, cloaks and other forms of disguise today generally are relegated to holidays, such as Halloween, but a new book by one of the world's leading experts on Venetian history, art and architecture suggests visual deception through masks, clothing, shoes, hair coloring and makeup was more the norm than the exception in 18th-century Venice.

The finding reveals how one of Europe's first prominent, cosmopolitan cities coped with problems relating to class structure and, in particular, the roles that women held in society.

Patricia Fortini Brown, chair of the Department of Art and Archaeology at Princeton University and author of the recently published Yale University Press book "Private Lives in Renaissance Venice," explained that in 16th-century Venice, courtesans -- prostitutes with upper-class clientele -- and Commedia dell'Arte street theater troupes captured the attention of the public by at times donning masks and other disguises as daywear, and not just for carnaval and other celebrations.

In the 17th century, Brown said noblemen, patrician women, and other wealthy individuals began to wear masks and cloaks throughout the city.
"This custom reached its apogee in the 18th century, as you can see in paintings by Pietro Longhi," Brown told Discovery News.

She explained, "Masks and cloaks allowed one to move about the city anonymously, and thus offered considerable protection, as with the chador in the Islamic world. They also allowed women to frequent dubious places of recreation, such as gambling casinos, without compromising their respectability." She added, "It seems as if the upper class all wandered around in public space incognito in that period (the 18th century)."

Courtesans were especially renowned for their extreme attire. Sketches and historical accounts from the period reveal that some women wore shoes that resembled circus act stilts. Extravagant hairstyles and copious use of makeup were common, but some women also cross-dressed to entice their suitors. As early as 1578, government records for Venice reveal that women dressed as men were touring the city's canals in gondolas.

The visual deception was not all a product of fun and games. "For a young woman without a dowry, a courtesan's life might well seem more appealing than a life of drudgery as a servant or as an unhappy bride married to someone she did not love and perhaps was required to work for as well," Brown explained.

She said many women had to work at Venice's shipyard, the Arsenale. The workday involved long, grueling hours, which might have led some to leave the shipyard to take their chances as courtesans. Glamorous tales of successful courtesans, such as Veronica Franco, added to the lifestyle's appeal. Even women from other parts of Europe traveled to Venice to seek their fortune as courtesans.

Apart from their more outlandish attire, some courtesans dressed in finery to blur the lines of class structure. "Courtesans deliberately wore clothing that allowed them to pass as proper matrons so that they could avoid laws that confined them to certain parts of the city, or that required them to sit in certain places in church," Brown said.

Paola Bagnatori, managing director of the Museo Italo Americano in San Francisco, was skeptical that masks were worn much outside of carnaval, but did admit that in post-Renaissance Venice, "Many people felt they had a license to do and dress as they pleased."

"Venice was in its splendor," she told Discovery News. "It was so powerful, so rich, and yet so corrupt. It is no wonder the drama of the city inspired writers, such as Shakespeare." Brown described Venice as a "stage set," where people were "actors when in public space." She added, "This is probably true to some degree in Italian cities in general during the early modern period, but it was particularly pronounced, and remarked upon, in Venice."

End of Discovery article

It was shame that they wanted to hide and they wanted to carry on in activities they would prefer no one know about. Is that good? Not as far as God is concerned.

--------------------------------------------------

Freemasons held many meetings and gatherings underground so that no one would see or know about it and what they do down there, for the rumors and allegations are that wild sex orgies were among the activities enjoyed at those gatherings. So darkness and underground secrecy helped them to conceal that they really do. Ben Franklin was said to be among these participants while visiting England and representing the colonies.

Stanley Kubrick's "Eye Wide Shut" movie showed an elite gathering where everyone word a costume disguising who they were. I have no doubt such things really do one. The bottom line is that such conduct betrays the claims to morality, virtue, and restraint of one's inner desires. One might question what they are really up to. so they do everything in secret Only those who have something to hide, do this as is in evidence in Venice in the 18th century as well. Even old pagan religions would perform rites and ceremonies where sex was involved and even costumes might be employed.

We were given the fruits of the sons of darkness so we would recognize who they are and what they really stand for. Those alert and awake will not be fooled by these who cover themselves in deeds of apparent charity, disguises as good honorable citizens, while carrying on like mad men in private and secret. What are they hiding? It does not matter. That they are hiding is all we need to know because sons of light do not hide what they do for they have nothing to be ashamed of and are proud of their works on behalf of God.

More Road Blocks
Back to Top

Universities do not promote knowledge, they prevent it. They quickly call any important artifact a hoax, without a consideration of the evidence or against it. They prevent funding of anything that might enlighten the masses or advance technology too far or too fast or both. They keep it all back so that only the military powers have the latest advanced technology. Common day to day commercial tech is kept at least 50 to 100 years behind the political/military tech.

The media all support and defend the lying scientists and academics. The medical complex, which includes the doctors and the AMA, the Pharmaceutical industry, the insurance industry, medical research and funding, all non-profit funders (so called), lawyers, and the law, all help to keep medicine and great medical advances from ever coming to light. They keep us sick and dying and take all our money with the promise of making us better and keeping us alive while having no intention of actually doing so. They will empty our bank accounts and let us die, anyway, while leaving nothing for those we would have liked to have left our money and possessions to.

Business tech like computers and such are only allowed to make minor advances while secret government computers are hundreds or thousands of times more capable in every way.

As well, should someone have some ability or knowledge, they have set up patents and copyrights that make it difficult if not impossible to make our own technology. If patented, then we have to pay enormous fees to copy it or it simply may not be allowed to copy it at all. Patents are unique to the last 200 years or so. What they can not hide and keep secret, they make illegal with patents so that while it might be easy to make, it is also illegal, no matter how easy.

So knowledge becomes forbidden, if it is known, and much more of it kept secret so that we do not know what we are missing. We do not know how far we have been held back. We think our civilization has made great progress when, in fact, we have been drastically held back and held down. Power is a block and hindrance, not an aid or advancement. It keeps us from having rather than giving us something.

Here is a little tip for you to understand your past, present, and future. We look back at ancient technology and say, despite the fact that we know something existed or took place, that they were not capable of that back then. How do we know that? Do we know or have evidence of everything they ever did, or has only a small portion of that survive for us to know?

Many times in history and archaeology, we started out believing we knew everything about a civilization and then new discoveries are made and we find out that they could and did do more than we ever thought at first was possible. For all that survives a civilization, there is also much that does not survive and is lost. Now I ask this! What do we have today that would survive or not survive? Well, that is a tricky question because we probably do not know about many advanced technologies since they are “classified” and “top secret.” Were our world to be destroyed tomorrow, What of our secret tech would survive or not?

What, of our current publicly well known world wide tech, would survive and what would not? We do not know how much is secret. Only a portion of what we commonly know would even survive. Much would never be known or found but that does not mean it did not exist. Future generations and discoverers would have to guess. Would the reports of our world and time be believed? It depends on if power existed in the future or not. Power might not wants us to know that people were capable of 2,000 or 4,000 years ago. It leaves much to wonder about. Because power controls what we know and what we are not allowed to know! Same as it ever was!

Now the same goes with history. Power needs to justify what it does, so it often rewrites history so that what it does can seem like it is good and/or justified, if not good. For years, we have had many nations in conflict so that history often survives in one place that had been rewritten or wiped out in another. So we have been sort of lucky but for how much longer? If the entire world comes under one authority, will all contradictory accounts be wiped out forever? It is not impossible that this could happen.

The media: billboards, fliers, newspapers, magazines, books, radio, TV, and yes, schools and school teachers are also media and propaganda. Any means used to project propaganda and history can mold and change our views if we have no dissenting sources to challenge the pervading and prevailing media sources. And if we have not developed sophisticated sharp precise intellectual and analytical thinking skills, we will get taken in. Because we have been limited in what has been taught to us, and most are not good thinkers. The few left are usually drowned out by the flood of propaganda; and if not, sometimes they are sued, fined, jailed, or even killed for thinking and speaking contrary to what the elite want.

Of course, Christians are not supposed to fight wars that are not authorized by God, but they do not listen to God. They obey their deceitful church leaders who tell them it is right to fight wars. They have been saying that since Constantine. Do not follow them.

Corrupt Christianity, governments, and big business can always be found in bed together. 2 is fine but 3 is much better in their minds. Call it the Unholy Trinity if you like. Satan has us surrounded on all sides. He has gathered everyone and everything that he could, together, to intimidate us and scare us into submission. But God has left us with enough to overcome if we want to exert ourselves. But Human nature is as such that it hates to exert itself. Laziness, both physical and intellectual, are our most common tendencies. The spirit is willing but the flesh is weak, right?

Secrecy and darkness are opposed to knowledge and light. We have to understand that and flee from those who conduct themselves in secrecy and the cover of darkness. We must be and remain in the light, sharing our knowledge to the degree God desires, being a light to the world, even as a lighthouse serves a warning to sailors coming near dangerous shores.

But I will offer this suggestion to you now. There are those who are politically savy and up on things. They know for a fact that there certainly is a world government and many who conduct many secret activities away from our sight. They could tell you much about what the bible describes, though they may not agree that it matches up with the Bible. But it does. Those Christians who are awake and aware in the world know about this stuff. They may well  know who Babylon and all the other characters of prophecy are. so if you want to know, you can know. God would not have told us if it were impossible to know. He told us so that we would seek this knowledge out and not get caught off guard by it. So begin your search today because there is not much time left.

So take a look now at what was understood by one great man way back in 1961. He saw it. He deplored it. He warned us about it. No one heard. No one listened. No one believed! And JFK died trying to help us and maybe taking on too big a power for the sons of darkness far out number the sons of light, a 100 or even a 1,000 to 1 or even more. Why? Will we still ignore him even now? Will his observations and his death still be in vain, even now, with world events being far more obvious in their intent now than in 1961? I hope not!

The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and secret proceedings.

>> Do you agree? I know I do! Secrecy is the exact opposite of principles we say we hold dear such as freedom of speech, the press, public trials, accountable government, freedom of information act, public elections, etc. We despise censorship, don't we? We hate cover-ups and lies. Secrecy goes against everything we say we stand for in our Constitution, Bill of Rights, our Judicial system and what have you. But more than that, God hates secrecy. He speaks of the sons of darkness, always hiding in the dark, sneaking around, up to no good. Secrecy, lies, and darkness are always seen as bad things, not good, in the symbolism God has chosen. Interesting that President Kennedy also chose to speak out against such conduct. <<

We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it.

>> The first line is so important. Our leaders tell us today that for the sake of security and protection of USA "interests," that secrecy is essential. But Jack says the dangers of  "excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts" are far more dangerous than the needs of security and protection from terrorism or the like. Do we believe Jack, or do we believe the current bunch of phonies? And Jack says that we do not stop secrecy with our own secrecy and restrictions. Yet our so-called benevolent leaders today are imposing ever greater restrictions on us to "protect" us. Secrecy, like lies, are never a protection or benefit. They are always ultimately harmful and dangerous. I like Jack's assertion much better. The survival of our nation will not happen if we do not also preserve our traditions of open, honest, accountable government and government conduct on all levels. Yet what we have today is politicians who do nothing but lie, sell us down the drain, and hide and keep secret everything from us and not wanting to account for anything they do or give us BS excuses for it. We never should have arrived at this point if we had protected freedom, openness, and accountability. But we let them slide and now we shall pay for it as we already are. Jack tried to warn us all. We did not believe him at the time. <<

And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment, that I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control.

>> Jack seems to have uttered a prophecy, a prediction here. And he was a president, not a prophet. But just as he predicted, we are now told that for our own security and protection, we must all live in a police state now. Jack was right and he wanted to stop it. But even at that time, it was already too late. There were far more sons of darkness than there were sons of light. But Jack saw something that told him this was coming. I wonder what he saw or knew about. I believe I know what he saw. <<

And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know."

>> Jack made it clear that he did not want anyone working for him to censor, stifle dissent or disapproval, to cover up, withhold from the press and the public, facts or anything else we deserve. Jack did not think that anyone should fear the truth and facts, ever! Truth could withstand any assault at any time and that truth was the only real protection we had, always and forever! Does that sound like today's world? I think not. We rarely hear truth any more. Mostly just lies and cover-up and excuses as they slide the knife up under our ribs and into our hearts.

Now this is not to say that Jack himself did not have a few secrets to keep. He was a playboy at times. But his secrets were no where near the likes of those carried on by very powerful secret sinister forces governing us in total secrecy.

Sons of Light love truth and seek it in all things. Courage seeks truth! Goodness and decency strive for truth, openness, candor, and revelation and exposure, not darkness and secrecy. Only the bad desire darkness, cover and secrecy. JFK made that very clear, didn't he? Truth equals life and prosperity. Lies equal death and destruction. But I ask, do you, the reader, believe this or not? JFK believed with all his heart. How much did he believe? He was willing to opening declare it to his enemies, assuming they would play fair in the political arena, and he was willing to die for it if he was wrong. And die he did! In fact, they killed him in broad daylight in the wide open for all the public to see. but through the legal process and media, they distorted and lied all about what really took place. The Zapruder film was kept from us for at least 11 years. Why? <<

For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

>> JFK says this is a world wide conspiracy under a single monolithic control, even then in 1961. Really, he as president ought to know if anyone does. It is now, even more so. Funny, isn't that what the Bible says? Imagine that! Those are mighty big words. And this conspiracy depends on secrecy and concealment to carry out what they do. There are plenty of secret societies that operate in our country and around the world. What are they doing and why? If it was and is so great, why not share it with us? Are they a threat? JFK seemed to think that they, and any secrecy, were. Do you agree with him? I suspect secret societies and others do not! Little wonder they don't, for they are up to something that will not please us at all.

And JFK says they are ruthless. Are you sure? Well, look how they killed him. Sure looks ruthless to me! And they use subtle infiltration (as spies, no doubt) rather than overt invasion with armies. But how do they employ vast human and material resources that combine so many different areas listed by him? Most of those things are controlled by money, banks, and big business and their non-profit tax shelters. Could big business be running the world? And who runs big business, since JFK says, like the Bible does, that it is run by a single monolithic source? Makes one wonder, does it not? But who would have believed this in 1961, not long after JFK was inaugurated? Not many, if any. But many are starting to believe now. But JFK knew it long before we believed it. Something to ponder. <<

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed."

>> JFK says its activities are not published, so he must think they control the media. Interesting. He says they silence dissenters. That is a lot of control. They also must watch and listen to everyone if they censor people who dissent. Total secrecy and control. Wow. No one listened. JFK was just some fringe wacko conspiracy theorist, huh? Yeah, and I'm the Queen of England, too. JFK did his best but those forces he warned of did him in. What shall be our reaction now, with 47 years to reflect? And that these warnings so closely mirror those of God is uncanny. You don't suppose JFK was doing some Bible reading, do you? ;-)

But I let you in on a mystery, a secret. Though not widely known or publicized, these things carried on in secret have been published in rare journals of the elite that they did not believe anyone would bother to read. But some did and some published it as well. They have sounded the alarm and let us know. While it is not common knowledge known by many, it is known by a small few here and there. It is hidden from most, and therefore secret from most, but not all. Seek and you shall find. Ask and it will be answered. Knock and it will be opened to you. For all who ask of God in faith will received. <<

No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.

>> Actually, the sons of darkness and secrecy agree with the underlined above and that is why they censor and suppress so much, attempting to keep us in ignorance, darkness and keep us uninformed and uneducated. If a president or anyone else is doing good and doing right, they should have nothing to fear from scrutiny and questions and they should not hesitate to explain themselves and account for themselves. If they will not answer, then they are hiding something. If they are hiding something, then we may automatically assume they are up to no good at all. <<

I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers-- I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: "An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it." We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.

>> Jack says he welcomes questions and is willing to account for himself. And I believe him. He intended good for American and American citizens. But he was virtually alone in that. <<

Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed-- and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy.

>> Debate and criticism are nothing to fear. They are vitally important. Jack said that without them, we will all fall. And maybe not just our country, but us and the whole world. For none of the world exists in isolation anymore and the bad guys control the whole world so that if a piece goes, it all goes. The survival of the human race and the world is now at stake. We ignored JFK, and look where we are now! If you ignore me, who attempts to speak for God, it will be much worse in probably less than 10 years from now. Most of you, if you are not obedient to God, will not be around in 10 years nor your world, either. It will all be ruined except for the Grace of God. Just ignore me and see what happens! <<

And that is why our press was protected by the First (emphasized) Amendment-- the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution-- not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"--but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.

>> Well, from this statement, we can see why newspapers are about to go under, even as many already have. They have failed to do anything but entertain and emphasize the trivial and sentimental, rather than inform, arouse, reflect, warn, ask tough questions and stick their nose into suspicious activities, lead in a good direction, warn of the bad, educate and even outrage if required. Yes, they failed to do anything good because they are nothing but bad, dark, secretive, evasive, evil. I am glad to see them all go down. How just and ironic! But JFK did say they were a business and that is precisely the problem. They are a business and part of the bigger network of all big business so they are controlled since they are buddies with all other big business. They look out for their buddies, not us. <<

This means greater coverage and analysis of international news-- for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security...  

>> So you see, when I say the whole world is in trouble, it is. Jack says that we must give attention to the whole world now, and not just the self interests of the USA. <<

"And so it is to the printing press--to the recorder of mans deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news-- that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent."

>> This would be the only thing that God would disagree with. We can not save ourselves and guide and govern ourselves. We are our own worst enemies. We need God as our shepherd and leader. Indeed, making use of the printing press, so to speak, even the internet which Jack could not foresee, to spread the message of both warning and hope. A certain hope that God will soon fix the sons of darkness and evil so that God can finally get on with His purpose which He had intended from the beginning, before Adam and Eve rejected God in the garden of Eden.

The press does not deserve the (good) reputation it has (if it still have it) and the halo it wears. It has no integrity and it is a sell-out whore. JFK was too kind to it. The press has no conscience at all. We've been betrayed! Conspiracy I say! <<

Here is a hospital bed speech from Texas governor John Connally, 5 days after (Nov. 27) being hit by a bullet in the limo with JFK, on Nov. 22, 1963. The interviewer had asked why Connally thought that JFK was gone and he was not. From his bed he responded, being quite alert, strong, and also prepared for such a question and a good answer, too. The YouTube link is provided in the "Related Articles" at the end of this article.

He [Kennedy] accomplished in death what he could not accomplish in life. To so shock and so stun a nation and the people and the world.

>> Oh, we were stunned alright. Shocked, mortified, and perhaps quite numbed. We could not believe such a thing could happen. But did we wake up, perhaps as Connally had hoped? I don't think so. At least not as much as we should have. <<

Now what’s happening to us; of the cancerous growth that’s being permitted to expanded and enlarge itself, upon the community and society in which we live, that breeds hatred, the bigotry, and intolerance and indifference; a lawlessness, that I think really an outward manifestation of what occurred here in Dallas.

>> Connally said we had a cancer in the country. It was growing and expanding then and now. And its fruit, the things manifest by this cancer were that it "breeds hatred, the bigotry, and intolerance and indifference; a lawlessness."  Now Connally is about to utter a few prophecies and warnings, himself, even as Jack did 2.5 years earlier.<<

It could have occurred in any other city in America . It is nothing more than a manifestation of an extremism on both sides that basically is the genesis of our self destruction if we’re ever gonna be destroyed.

>> Both sides as he put it, had gone too far and got too nasty; and that this was the start and beginning, our genesis, of self destruction, if we are destined to be destroyed. It would be at our own hand and cause that it happens. He was right and it matches with what God has warned. AT the mouth of 2 witnesses, let a matter be firmly established. Jack and John C. are two, and God and I make 4. Care to join us? <<

I am not the least fearful of any foreign enemy so long as we have within ourselves, not hate but human understanding, not passion and prejudice but reason and tolerance, not ignorance but knowledge and the willingness to use that knowledge. This is the only answer I can give, Martin, why he’s gone and I’m not.

>> Connally says he is not fearful or worried as long as we have understanding, reason, and tolerance, knowledge and the will to use it. But what if we don't have those things and have the hate, passion and prejudice, and ignorance? Then we all have everything to fear. Given that JFK had just been killed, I fail to see any optimism. We were already outnumbered and our best was killed off. Its the end of the world as we know it. Most scary of all was that no one really believed what JFK warned to the press and what Connally also warned of. Why did we not see and listen? Were we that dull and blind? It would appear that was the case for look where we are now! Hope??? I think not except for God and His salvation. <<

"They" refers to Christ's true followers. They will not say, Look, here he is or There he is. For behold the Kingdom of God is here in your midst and has arrived, in the flesh and very visible. NO, this they will not say because they know Jesus will not return in the flesh.

But even more noteworthy is how most botch up 21. While the RSV in Luke 21, put the proper quotes around certain phrases, they fail to do it here and it is nearly an identical account from the very same book, no less. This entire phrase [Lo, here! Or, Lo, there! For behold the kingdom of God is in your midst. ] should have had quotes around it, it being what people would be saying about the antichrist, claiming to be Jesus. "Look, Jesus is in your midst. Come and see him!" But Jesus says, "Do not go after them/him." For you will not be able to see Jesus in the flesh with your eyes. You will perceive him with the events you see. Hope this clears it all up. Most expect to see a literal physical visible Jesus. And they will see one, supposedly one. These will fall for the antichrist. I guarantee it! Don't you be one of them, too.  As well, most deceivers today want to convince you that Jesus will come in the flesh for they want you to fall for the antichrist and go along with him. You have been warned as much as is humanly possible. Luke continues. <<

Luke 17:
22 And He said to the disciples, Days will come when you will long to see one of the days of the Son of man, and will not see.
23 And they will say to you, Lo, here! Or, Lo, there! Do not go away, nor follow.

>> Jesus repeats himself. You will not see! "They" will even say, Look, he is here (in the flesh). He is over there! Go see! Don't fall for a word of it. "They" is now those who follow the antichrist, not the real Jesus. We know Jesus is not coming back in the flesh. He is a spirit in heaven, even as God is. That is his home now, even as it was before he left heaven to become a man on earth. He does not need to come in the flesh anymore. Now also carefully note his explanation in verse 24 below. It is like the lightning that shines everywhere at the same time, lighting up the whole sky. He will not be in one local place, like a man. He will be at work everywhere all over the world. You can take that to the bank!

I am virtually the only one teaching this. All the other idiots want to trick you. This account makes it plainly and outspokenly clear. You have no excuse for getting fooled by the imposter/deceiver or the false prophets who support him. And if I am the only one setting the record straight. then you might want to pay more attention to the rest of my stuff since I alone stand firm against the coming of the antichrist, which will fool just about everyone. <<

24 For as the lightning which lights up, flashing from the one part under heaven and shines to the other part
     under heaven, so also will the Son of man be in His day.
25 But first He must suffer many things and be rejected from this generation.
26 And as it was in the days of Noah, so also it will be in the days of the Son of man.
27 They were eating, drinking, marrying, giving in marriage, until the day Noah went into the ark. And the flood came and destroyed all.
28 And likewise, as it was in the days of Lot, they were eating, drinking, buying, selling, planting, building;
29 but on the day Lot went out from Sodom, it rained fire and brimstone from the heaven and destroyed all.
30 Even so it will be in the day the Son of man is revealed.  >> not to our eyes, but to our discernment and understanding. <<
31 In that day, he who will be on the housetop, let him not come down to take his goods from the house.
     And likewise, he in the field, let him not return to the things behind.
32 Remember Lot’s wife.
33 Whoever seeks to save his life [by compromising], he will lose it. And whoever will lose it [only temporarily till the resurrection], he will preserve it.

Back to Top